Digital Globalization and Intercultural Transmission Processes in Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17806055Keywords:
Globalization, digital globalization, intercultural transfer, transfer in educationAbstract
This study attempts to reveal how digital globalization shapes intercultural transfer processes in education. The study conceptually examines digital globalization and intercultural transfer. The importance of intercultural transfer is emphasized within the framework of knowledge, value, norm, and experience dimensions, and the problems encountered in this process, including language barriers, cultural prejudices, the digital divide, and pedagogical deficiencies, are discussed. International student exchange programs, digital collaborative projects, and intercultural curricula, as implemented in different countries, are discussed within the context of intercultural transfer. The effects of digital globalization are discussed in the context of rapid access to information, virtual interaction, pedagogical innovations, and experience-based learning. Considering the current situation, it is anticipated that the importance of intercultural transfer will increase in
the future with technological tools and experiential learning methods. The study examines the concrete effects of digital globalization on intercultural transfer processes and offers suggestions for more qualified intercultural transfer processes. Specifically, predictions are shared regarding the path and direction of intercultural transfer in education within the context of digital globalization.
References
Arjun, Appadurai, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. (USA: University of Minnesota Press: 1996).
Banks, James A. An Introduction to Multicultural Education (4th ed.). (USA: Pearson, 2008).
Banks, James A. & Cherry A. M. Banks, Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives (7th ed.). (Wiley, 2010).
Bowen, Glenn, A. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method”, Qualitative Research Journal, 9, sy. 2, (2009), 27–40.
Buckingham, David. The Media Education Manifesto. (UK: Polity Press, 2019).
Castells, Manuel. The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, (UK: Blackwell Publishing, 1996).
Creswell, John W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, (CA: Sage Publications, 2014).
Darla K. Deardorff, “Identification and Assessment of Intercultural Competence as a Student Outcome of Internationalization”. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10, sy. 3 (2006), 241–266.
Foucault M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. (New York: Vintage Books, 1977).
Foucault, M. The History of Sexuality, (Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 1978).
Friedman, Thomas. Revolution Hits the Universities. (USA: The New York Times, 2013).
Howard Gardner, Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. (USA:Basic Books ,1983).
Hofstede, Geert. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. (USA: Sage Publications, 2001).
Keidanren. Society 5.0: Co-creating the future (Excerpt). (Japan: Keidanren, 2018).
Trilling, Bernie & Charles Fadel. 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Jossey-Bass. (San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, 2009).
UNESCO, Open Educational Resources (OER). (UNESCO Publishing, 2009).
Jan Van Dijk, The Digital Divide. (USA: Polity Press, 2020).
Winner, Langdon. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?”. Daedalus, 109, sy. 1 (1980), 121-136.
Yurdakal, İbrahim Halil, “Türkçe Öğretiminde 21. YY Becerileri, Teknolojik yaklaşımlara dayalı Türkçe öğretimi içinde” (s. 62-97), (Edi: S. Aslan) (Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 2023).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 İbrahim Halil YURDAKAL

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.